Section 124 — Committee to report to High Court
The Committee’s voice is built in. Every Rule Committee shall report to its High Court on any proposal to annul, alter or add to the First Schedule rules or to make new rules; and before making any rules under § 122, the High Court shall take that report into consideration. The Committee advises — and the High Court must hear it before it acts.
How to read Section 124
The Committee reports
Every Rule Committee (§ 123) shall report to its High Court on any proposal to annul, alter or add to the First Schedule rules, or to make new rules.
The High Court must consider it
Before making any rules under § 122, the High Court shall take that report into consideration — a mandatory step.
Advisory, not binding
The Court must consider the report; it is not bound by it. The rule-making power stays with the High Court.
The bare Act
Every Rule Committee shall make a report to the High Court established at the town at which it is constituted on any proposal to annul, alter or add to the rules in the First Schedule or to make new rules, and before making any rules under section 122 the High Court shall take such report into consideration.
→ A mandatory consultation step in the § 122 rule-making process: the Committee (§ 123) advises, the High Court decides — the report must be considered but does not bind.
Note. § 124 stands as in the original Code. It links § 123 (the Committee) to § 122 (the power) — the High Court cannot make, annul or alter rules without first taking the Committee’s report into account.
Key terms decoded
The body constituted under § 123 — bench, bar and the subordinate judiciary — whose function § 124 fixes: to report on rule proposals.
A duty (“shall”) — the Committee must give its views in writing on the proposal.
Any move to change the First Schedule rules — the same three verbs as § 122 — or to make new rules.
The High Court must actually weigh the report before acting — not merely receive it. But it may, after considering, differ from it.
The consideration must come first — it is a pre-condition to the High Court’s exercise of its rule-making power.
The Committee is a consultative body — its report informs the decision; the final power remains the High Court’s.
The picture — the Committee advises, the Court considers
§ 124 wires the Committee into the rule-making loop. A proposal does not go straight to a rule: it passes through the Committee’s report, which the High Court must weigh before it makes, annuls or alters anything under § 122 — consultation made compulsory, the decision left to the Court.
Section 124, part by part
Connected provisions
Section 124 is the link between the Rule Committee (§ 123) and the rule-making power (§ 122): the Committee’s report is a mandatory input the High Court must consider before it makes, annuls or alters the First Schedule rules — which are then approved (§ 126) and published (§ 127).
