Welcome to LawTutorial.in – Your Partner in Understanding Law

CPC 1908 — Section 13: When foreign judgment not conclusive

CPC, 1908 · Part I · Jurisdiction of the Courts

When foreign judgment not conclusive

A foreign judgment is conclusive here — unless it falls into one of six exceptions.

§ 13

The bare Act

13. When foreign judgment not conclusive.

A foreign judgment shall be conclusive as to any matter thereby directly adjudicated upon between the same parties or between parties under whom they or any of them claim litigating under the same title except—

(a) where it has not been pronounced by a Court of competent jurisdiction;

(b) where it has not been given on the merits of the case;

(c) where it appears on the face of the proceedings to be founded on an incorrect view of international law or a refusal to recognise the law of India in cases in which such law is applicable;

(d) where the proceedings in which the judgment was obtained are opposed to natural justice;

(e) where it has been obtained by fraud;

(f) where it sustains a claim founded on a breach of any law in force in India.

How to read Section 13

The rule

A foreign judgment (§2(6)) is conclusive in India on any matter it directly decided — it operates as res judicata between the parties.

The six exits

Clauses (a)–(f) are the only grounds on which that conclusiveness fails — jurisdiction, merits, law, natural justice, fraud, Indian law.

Effect

Conclusive unless an exception is shown. The party resisting it must bring the case within (a)–(f).

Conclusive — unless an exception

The default, and the only way out

Foreign judgment
(matter directly adjudicated)
✓ CONCLUSIVE
operates as res judicata
× NOT conclusive
if any of (a)–(f)

The six exceptions (a)–(f)

aNo competent jurisdiction

The foreign court had no jurisdiction over the matter or the defendant.

bNot on the merits

Decided by default or a technicality — not on the real dispute.

cWrong view of law

Founded on an incorrect view of international law, or a refusal to recognise Indian law where applicable.

dAgainst natural justice

Unfair procedure — no proper notice / hearing, or a biased court.

eObtained by fraud

The judgment was procured by fraud on the court or the party.

fBreach of Indian law

It sustains a claim founded on a breach of any law in force in India.

The rule, dissected

The ruleA foreign judgment shall be conclusive as to any matter thereby directly adjudicated uponDefault: a foreign judgment is conclusive on any matter it directly decided — barring re-litigation here.Conclusive
Partiesbetween the same parties or between parties under whom they or any of them claim litigating under the same titleConclusive between the same parties or their privies, in the same title — the res judicata language.Same parties / title
Exceptionexcept— (a) … (f)Conclusiveness fails only if one of the six exceptions (a)–(f) is established — the burden is on the party resisting.Six exits

The maxim behind it

Latin maxim

Res judicata pro veritate accipitur

“A matter adjudged is accepted as true.”

resa matter / thing
judicataadjudged / decided
pro veritateas true
accipituris accepted

Why it fits §13: a foreign judgment is treated as conclusive — accepted as true between the parties — unless one of the six exceptions is shown.

Connected rules & sections

§ 11

Res judicata

§13 applies the res judicata idea to foreign judgments.

§ 14

Presumption

A certified copy is presumed to be of a competent court.

§ 2(6)

“Foreign judgment”

The judgment of a foreign Court (§2(5)).

§ 44A

Execution

Execution of decrees of reciprocating territories.

(d)

Natural justice

Notice + fair hearing before an impartial court.

Burden

On the resister

Conclusive unless an exception is proved.