Welcome to LawTutorial.in – Your Partner in Understanding Law

CPC, 1908 — Section 151: Saving of Inherent Powers of Court

CPC, 1908 · Part XI · Miscellaneous (§§132–158)
⚖ The Court’s reserve power

Section 151 — Saving of inherent powers of Court

The Code’s most-invoked provision. It declares that nothing in the Code limits the Court’s inherent power to make whatever orders are necessary for the ends of justice, or to prevent abuse of its own process. The power is not created by § 151 — it is inherent in every court, and merely saved here.

§ 151

How to read Section 151

Ends of justice

Where the Code is silent, the Court may make such orders as are necessary to do justice between the parties.

Prevent abuse

The Court may act to stop its own process being misused — vexatious, fraudulent or oppressive use of the court’s machinery.

Saved, not conferred

§ 151 does not grant the power — it preserves a power every court inherently has, and which the Code is not to be read as cutting down.

The bare Act

Section 151 · verbatim

Nothing in this Code shall be deemed to limit or otherwise affect the inherent power of the Court to make such orders as may be necessary for the ends of justice or to prevent abuse of the process of the Court.

In short: the Court keeps an inherent power — not written out as a specific rule — to pass any order needed to do justice or to stop its process being abused; and the Code must not be read as taking that power away.

→ § 151 is a saving clause, not a source of power. Inherent powers are supplementary: they fill the gaps the Code leaves — they cannot be used in conflict with, or to override, an express provision. They are exercised sparingly, in exceptional cases, ex debito justitiae (as the justice of the case demands).

The two limbs of the power

A · For the ends of justice

To make an order justice requires where the Code provides no specific remedy — so a litigant is not denied relief merely because no rule fits.

  • Recall / set aside an order obtained by fraud or without jurisdiction
  • Consolidate connected suits, or stay one suit pending another
  • Permit a necessary inquiry or correct an obvious injustice
  • Grant restitution or relief beyond the letter of a specific section, where justice needs it
B · To prevent abuse of process

To stop the court’s own machinery being turned into an instrument of oppression, fraud or harassment.

  • Dismiss or stay a vexatious / sham or clearly frivolous proceeding
  • Set aside a decree or order procured by fraud on the court
  • Prevent multiplicity of proceedings over the same matter
  • Strike out scandalous or oppressive matter; restrain a party abusing the process

Key terms decoded

Inherent power

A power that belongs to a court by its very nature as a court of justice — not derived from any particular section. § 151 preserves it.

“Shall be deemed to limit or affect”

A direction of construction: the Code is not to be read as cutting down the inherent power — even where it is silent.

Ends of justice

Doing substantial justice between the parties — the positive limb, used where no express provision supplies the needed order.

Abuse of the process of the Court

Using the court’s procedure for an improper, oppressive or fraudulent purpose — the protective limb, used to stop such misuse.

Supplementary, not overriding

Inherent power fills gaps; it cannot be exercised contrary to an express provision of the Code, nor to do what the law forbids.

Exercised sparingly

Used with great caution, in exceptional circumstances — never as a routine substitute for a specific remedy the Code provides.

The picture — a reserve power, kept within bounds

Inherent power — saved, and kept in its proper place the Court’s INHERENT POWERsaved by § 151 — not conferred by it A · for the ENDS OF JUSTICEmake the order justice needs where the Code is silent B · to PREVENT ABUSE of processstop the court’s machinery being misused THE BOUND: used only where the Code is SILENTnever in conflict with an express provision, nor to do what the law forbids.

§ 151 gives the Court a reserve of authority for the cases the Code-makers could not foresee — to do justice and to police its own process — while the bound (no conflict with express provisions) keeps that reserve from swallowing the Code’s scheme.

Part by part — the one sentence

the saving

Nothing in this Code shall be deemed to limit or otherwise affect the inherent power of the Court…

A rule of construction: the Code is not to be read as taking away the court’s inherent power — the power is recognised and preserved, not created.

limb A — justice

…to make such orders as may be necessary for the ends of justice…

The positive limb — to make whatever order justice requires where the Code offers no specific remedy.

limb B — abuse

…or to prevent abuse of the process of the Court.

The protective limb — to stop the court’s process being misused for an oppressive or fraudulent end.

The settled principles

A wide power — disciplined by clear limits

How the courts have confined and applied § 151.

Inherent, not conferred
§ 151 saves a pre-existing power — it does not create one.
Gaps only
Used where the Code is silent — not where it has spoken.
No conflict
It cannot be exercised against an express provision of the Code.
Not a substitute
Where a specific remedy exists, § 151 cannot be used to bypass it.
Sparingly
Exercised with caution, in exceptional cases, to secure justice.
Not against law
It cannot be used to do something the law forbids or has no power to do.
Read together, these keep § 151 a servant of the Code, not its master: a flexible power to do justice — bounded by the Code’s own express scheme.

Leading authorities

Manohar Lal Chopra v. Rai Bahadur Rao Raja Seth Hiralal
AIR 1962 SC 527
Inherent power may supplement the Code (e.g. a temporary injunction not strictly within Order XXXIX) — but cannot be exercised in conflict with the Code’s express provisions.
Padam Sen v. State of Uttar Pradesh
AIR 1961 SC 218
Inherent powers are to secure the ends of justice — they do not extend to doing something against statute (here, no power to appoint a commissioner to seize a party’s books).
K. K. Velusamy v. N. Palanisamy
(2011) 11 SCC 275
§ 151 is not a substitute for specific provisions; it is to be used sparingly, where there is no express provision and the ends of justice require it.

Connected provisions

Section 151 is the Code’s great residuary power. It backs the specific provisions throughout the Code — e.g. amendment (§ 152–153), restitution (§ 144) and the rule-based remedies — supplying justice where they fall short, but never displacing them.

Test yourself
1 What are the two limbs of the inherent power saved by § 151? — To make orders necessary for the ends of justice, and to prevent abuse of the process of the Court.
2 Does § 151 create the inherent power? — No — it merely saves a power inherent in every court; the Code is not to be read as limiting it.
3 May inherent power be used against an express provision of the Code? — No — it is supplementary, used where the Code is silent; it cannot conflict with or override an express provision (Manohar Lal Chopra).
Part XI · Miscellaneous · Section 151 — Saving of inherent powers of Court.