Welcome to LawTutorial.in – Your Partner in Understanding Law

Detention and Release — Section 58

CPC, 1908 · Part II · Execution · How long, and what release means

Detention and Release

Civil imprisonment for debt is capped and graduated: up to 3 months or 6 weeks by the size of the decree, none at all for small sums — and once released, no re-arrest (though the debt lives on).

§ 58

How to read Section 58

The ceiling

This is the maximum period § 51(c) points to. Detention is capped — 3 months for larger decrees, 6 weeks for smaller ones.

The floor

Sub-section (1A) bars detention altogether where the decree does not exceed ₹2,000 — a tiny debt never lands a person in prison.

After release

Release does not discharge the debt — but the debtor cannot be re-arrested under that decree. The arrest remedy is spent; the debt survives.

The bare Act

58. Detention and release.

(1) Every person detained in the civil prison in execution of a decree shall be so detained,—

(a) where the decree is for the payment of a sum of money exceeding [five thousand rupees]1, 2, for a period not exceeding three months, and

3[(b) where the decree is for the payment of a sum of money exceeding two thousand rupees, but not exceeding five thousand rupees, for a period not exceeding six weeks.]

4(1A) For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that no order for detention of the judgment-debtor in civil prison in execution of a decree for the payment of money shall be made, where the total amount of the decree does not exceed [two thousand rupees]5.

(2) A judgment-debtor released from detention under this section shall not merely by reason of his release be discharged from his debt, but he shall not be liable to be re-arrested under the decree in execution of which he was detained in the civil prison.

Footnotes

1. Subs. by Act 104 of 1976, s. 22, for certain words (w.e.f. 1-2-1977).

2. Subs. by Act 46 of 1999, s. 5, for “one thousand rupees” (w.e.f. 1-7-2002).

3. Subs. by s. 5, ibid., for clause (b) (w.e.f. 1-7-2002).

4. Ins. by Act 104 of 1976, s. 22 (w.e.f. 1-2-1977).

5. Subs. by Act 46 of 1999, s. 5, for “five hundred rupees” (w.e.f. 1-7-2002).

Key terms decoded

Civil prison

Detention for a civil (debt) default — not a criminal jail. § 58 fixes how long it may last.

Period not exceeding three months / six weeks

The maximum detention, graduated by the size of the decree — the cap § 51(c) refers to.

For the removal of doubts

A clarificatory declaration (sub-s 1A) — it puts beyond argument that small decrees carry no power to detain.

Released ≠ discharged

Coming out of prison does not wipe out the debt — it only ends that spell of detention.

Re-arrested under the decree

Being jailed again under the same decree — which § 58(2) forbids once the debtor has been detained and released.

Total amount of the decree

The whole sum decreed — the figure tested against the ₹2,000 floor and the ₹5,000 slab.

The picture — the detention slabs

Decree ≤ ₹2,000 → NO civil-prison detention at all — (1A) ₹2,000 < decree ≤ ₹5,000 → detention up to six weeks — (1)(b) Decree > ₹5,000 → detention up to three months — (1)(a) larger the decree → longer the cap (but always capped) On release — (2) ✗ debt NOT discharged it survives — recoverable from his property ✓ but NO re-arrest under that same decree — the arrest remedy is spent

Detention scales with the debt but is always capped; below ₹2,000 it is off the table; and it is a one-shot coercion — suffered once, never repeated under the same decree.

Section 58, part by part

The slabs, the floor, and what release does (and does not) do — open each:





Sub-section (1) caps the detention period and grades it by the decree amount.

💵Money decree
> ₹5,000 → 3 months
> ₹2,000–₹5,000 → 6 weeks
The cap
Every person detained in the civil prison in execution of a decree shall be so detained
§ 58(1) fixes the maximum length of any civil-prison detention in execution — the ceiling § 51(c) defers to.
(a) Over ₹5,000
where the decree is for the payment of a sum of money exceeding five thousand rupees, for a period not exceeding three months
Decree over ₹5,000 → detention up to three months (the ₹5,000 figure was raised from ₹1,000 in 1999).
(b) ₹2,000–₹5,000
where the decree is for the payment of a sum of money exceeding two thousand rupees, but not exceeding five thousand rupees, for a period not exceeding six weeks
Decree over ₹2,000 but up to ₹5,000 → detention up to six weeks (clause (b) was recast in 1999).

Sub-section (1A) puts a floor under it — a clarification added in 1976.

🔒Decree ≤ ₹2,000
🚫No detention order at all
A clarification
For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared
A declaratory sub-section (inserted 1976) — it settles, beyond argument, that the smallest decrees carry no power to imprison.
The floor
that no order for detention of the judgment-debtor in civil prison in execution of a decree for the payment of money shall be made, where the total amount of the decree does not exceed two thousand rupees
No detention at all where the decree is ₹2,000 or less (the floor was raised from ₹500 in 1999) — petty debts are taken out of the prison route entirely.

Sub-section (2) draws the line between losing one’s liberty and losing the debt.

Debt not discharged
🔓But no re-arrest under that decree
The debt survives
A judgment-debtor released from detention under this section shall not merely by reason of his release be discharged from his debt
Coming out of prison is not payment — the debt remains, recoverable (e.g. against his property by attachment & sale).
But no re-arrest
but he shall not be liable to be re-arrested under the decree in execution of which he was detained in the civil prison
The arrest remedy is spent: having once been detained, he cannot be jailed again under the same decree. Imprisonment is a one-shot coercion.

How the sub-sections work as one body

(1) Capped & gradeddetention is capped — up to 3 months (> ₹5,000) or 6 weeks (₹2,000–₹5,000); the bigger the decree, the longer the ceiling
(1A) A floor below itbut ≤ ₹2,000no detention at all; the smallest debts are taken out of the prison route entirely
(2) Spent, once usedon release the debt survives (recoverable from property) but there is no re-arrest under that decree — the coercion is one-shot

The three sub-sections make civil detention a measured, proportionate, last-resort coercion. (1) ties its length to the size of the debt and caps it; (1A) switches it off entirely for petty sums; and (2) makes clear it is a one-shot pressure — it can be used once under a decree and never wipes out the debt, which the creditor must ultimately recover from the debtor’s property. Liberty is squeezed only briefly, only for real sums, and only once.

Amendment history — a timeline

§ 58 was reshaped twice — first a floor was added, then every money figure was raised:

1977
Act 104 of 1976, s. 22 (w.e.f. 1-2-1977) — a floor is added
Change A words in sub-section (1)(a) were substituted.
Change B a new sub-section (1A) was inserted — declaring that no detention may be ordered for the smallest decrees.
Why to put beyond doubt that petty debts should never lead to imprisonment.
2002
Act 46 of 1999, s. 5 (w.e.f. 1-7-2002) — the figures rise
Change the money limits were raised: in (1)(a) ₹5,000 for ₹1,000; clause (b) was recast (the ₹2,000–₹5,000 / six-week slab); and in (1A) the floor became ₹2,000 for ₹500.
Why to keep pace with rising money values — lifting the floor so far fewer (small) debts could attract detention, and re-setting the slab boundaries.

The principle behind it

Civil detention coerces payment; it does not discharge the debt.
It is a coercive mode of execution — pressure on a debtor who can pay but will not; release never satisfies or wipes out the debt.
Origin This is a settled principle, not a Latin maxim or a quotation — the line above is a plain-language summary. Its roots: England’s Debtors Act, 1869 (which ended imprisonment for debt except for those who could pay but would not); Article 11 of the ICCPR (“No one shall be imprisoned merely on the ground of inability to fulfil a contractual obligation”); and, in India, Jolly George Varghese v. Bank of Cochin, (1980) 2 SCC 360 (Krishna Iyer J.) — jailing a debtor for mere inability to pay offends Article 21; detention is justified only against the contumacious debtor (means + refusal or bad faith, per the § 51 proviso).
In § 58: that principle is written into three limits — detention is capped in time and graded by amount (1), barred for petty sums (1A), and spent once used (2). It squeezes a recalcitrant debtor for a short, fixed spell, then stops; and because release never discharges the debt, the creditor’s real recovery still lies against the debtor’s property. Paired with § 51’s rule that no one is jailed for mere inability to pay, § 58 keeps civil arrest a narrow, humane, last resort.

How § 58 connects

§ 58 supplies the period-cap the arrest sections depend on. The live links open them.

Read with: a debtor is detained under § 58 only after the § 51 proviso’s grounds are met (bad faith / means-and-refusal / fiduciary default) — and never if he is a woman under a money decree (§ 56).
How long, and what next?
1 Decree ≤ ₹2,000? → no detention at all (1A).
2 Decree ₹2,000–₹5,000 → max 6 weeks; over ₹5,000 → max 3 months (1).
3 After release → no re-arrest under that decree, but the debt survives (recover from property) (2).
Part II · Execution · §§ 36–74 — § 57 · § 58 · § 59 (release on ground of illness)