Welcome to LawTutorial.in – Your Partner in Understanding Law

Seizure of Property in a Dwelling-House — Section 62

CPC, 1908 · Part II · Execution · The home’s threshold

Seizure of Property in a Dwelling-House

Execution lets an officer walk into a home and carry off a debtor’s goods. Section 62 sets the manners of that intrusion — when he may enter, how far he may force doors, and the courtesy owed to a secluded woman of the house.

§ 62

How to read Section 62

Section 51(b) lets the Court enforce a money decree by attachment and sale of movable property — goods that usually sit inside someone’s home. Section 62 is the code of conduct for the officer’s body as it crosses the threshold. Read it as three gates on one act of entry.

Gate 1 · The night bar

An officer carrying a seizure warrant may not enter a dwelling-house after sunset and before sunrise. The home is inviolate at night.

Gate 2 · The two doors

The outer door may be broken only against the debtor who refuses access; once lawfully inside, an inner room may be forced on reason to believe the goods are there.

Gate 3 · The secluded woman

If a room is occupied by a woman who by custom does not appear in public, she must get notice, reasonable time and facility to withdraw before the officer enters.

The bare Act

Section 62 · verbatim

(1) No person executing any process under this Code directing or authorizing seizure of movable property shall enter any dwelling-house after sunset and before sunrise.

(2) No outer door of a dwelling-house shall be broken open unless such dwelling-house is in the occupancy of the judgment-debtor and he refuses or in any way prevents access thereto, but when the person executing any such process has duly gained access to any dwelling-house, he may break open the door of any room in which he has reason to believe any such property to be.

(3) Where a room in a dwelling-house is in the actual occupancy of a woman who, according to the customs of the country, does not appear in public, the person executing the process shall give notice to such woman that she is at liberty to withdraw; and, after allowing reasonable time for her to withdraw and giving her reasonable facility for withdrawing, he may enter such room for the purpose of seizing the property, using at the same time every precaution, consistent with these provisions, to prevent its clandestine removal.

Amendment history

Section 62 stands today exactly as enacted in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. It has never been amended, and no State amendment touches it.

Key terms decoded

Process

The Court’s written command (here, a warrant of attachment) carried out by an officer — the paper that “directs or authorizes” the seizure.

Seizure of movable property

Physically taking possession of the debtor’s goods — furniture, cash, ornaments, tools — under a warrant.

Dwelling-house

A building actually used as a residence — not a shop, godown or office. The protection attaches because people live there.

After sunset and before sunrise

The hours of darkness. Entry to seize is barred during this window — the “no night raids” rule.

Outer door

The main external door giving entry into the house itself — distinguished from the inner door of a room.

Occupancy of the judgment-debtor

The debtor himself must be living in / holding that house. A third person’s outer door may not be broken.

Refuses or in any way prevents access

The debtor actively shuts the officer out or obstructs his entry — the trigger that justifies forcing the outer door.

Duly gained access

Lawfully got inside (peacefully, or by lawfully breaking the outer door under sub-section 2). Only then do the inner-room powers open up.

Break open

To force a door by physical means. Permitted only within the strict limits the section draws.

Reason to believe

An honest belief on objective grounds — not mere whim — that the seizable goods are inside that particular room.

Actual occupancy of a woman

A room in which such a woman is in fact present and residing — the situation that triggers the seclusion safeguard.

Customs of the country · does not appear in public

A woman who, by the social custom she observes (e.g. purdah/seclusion), does not show herself to outside men.

At liberty to withdraw

Free to leave the room before the officer enters — she must be told of this freedom by notice.

Reasonable time & facility for withdrawing

Enough time, and a practical means/route, to leave with dignity before the officer steps in.

Clandestine removal

Secret spiriting-away of the goods. The officer must guard against the withdrawal being used as cover to smuggle property out.

Consistent with these provisions

Every precaution he takes must still respect the seclusion safeguard — he cannot use “preventing removal” as an excuse to ignore her right to withdraw.

The picture — one entry, gated three ways

Officer with seizure warrant GATE 1 · TIME NO entry after sunset & before sunrise GATE 2 · FORCE Outer door: only if debtor refuses · inner rooms on reasonable belief GATE 3 · DIGNITY Secluded woman: notice + time + facility to withdraw Seize the goods

One act of entry, narrowed by three gates in order — time (1), then force (2), then dignity (3). Each must be cleared before the next matters.

Section 62, part by part

Each sub-section is a separate gate. Switch tabs to walk through its operative phrases.





NO ENTRYsunset → sunrise
Who is bound
No person executing any process under this Code
The rule binds the executing officer / process-server — anyone carrying out the Court’s command. It is a personal discipline on the agent of the State.
Which process
directing or authorizing seizure of movable property
It applies specifically to a warrant whose object is to seize movable goods. The whole section is keyed to attachment of movables inside a home.
The forbidden act
shall enter any dwelling-house
What is prohibited is entry into a residence. The command is mandatory — the officer has no discretion to ignore it.
The time window
after sunset and before sunrise
The bar operates only during the hours of darkness. By day he may enter (subject to sub-sections 2 and 3); by night the home is inviolate.
OUTER DOORINNER ROOMS — once lawfully inside
The base bar
No outer door of a dwelling-house shall be broken open
The default is absolute protection for the main external door — it may never be forced, except in the one situation the next phrases carve out.
Condition — whose house
unless such dwelling-house is in the occupancy of the judgment-debtor
The exception works only against the debtor’s own house. A stranger’s outer door stays absolutely protected.
Condition — his obstruction
and he refuses or in any way prevents access thereto
Both limbs must hold: it is the debtor’s house and he is actively shutting the officer out. Only his own obstruction unlocks the force.
The pivot — once lawfully in
but when the person executing any such process has duly gained access to any dwelling-house
The clause turns. After the officer is lawfully inside (peacefully or by the permitted breaking), a wider internal power switches on.
The inner power
he may break open the door of any room
Inside, the strict outer-door condition relaxes: any room’s door may be forced — subject only to the belief-test that follows.
The leash on it
in which he has reason to believe any such property to be
He may not ransack at random. He may force only a room he has objective reason to believe holds the seizable goods.
room in her occupancy1 · NOTICE she may withdraw2 · TIME + FACILITY to leave3 · THEN enter, guard goods
The trigger
Where a room in a dwelling-house is in the actual occupancy of a woman
The safeguard fires only when a woman is in fact occupying the room the officer wishes to enter.
Which woman
who, according to the customs of the country, does not appear in public
It protects specifically the woman who observes seclusion (purdah) — whose custom is not to show herself to outside men. Her dignity is the protected interest.
Duty 1 — notice
the person executing the process shall give notice to such woman that she is at liberty to withdraw
Before entering he must warn her and tell her she is free to leave. The notice is mandatory.
Duty 2 — time & means
and, after allowing reasonable time for her to withdraw and giving her reasonable facility for withdrawing
He must wait a reasonable while and provide a practical way out, so she can leave with dignity — not be flushed out abruptly.
Only then — the entry
he may enter such room for the purpose of seizing the property
The power to enter revives only after the notice and the waiting — and only for the limited purpose of seizing goods.
The balancing duty
using at the same time every precaution, consistent with these provisions, to prevent its clandestine removal
While honouring her withdrawal, he must guard the goods so the seclusion is not abused to smuggle property away — dignity and diligence held in balance.

How the three sub-sections work as one body

(1) WHEN
Time gate
May he enter now? Never between sunset and sunrise.
(2) HOW
Force gate
Having a lawful daytime entry, how much may he break? Outer door only against an obstructing debtor; inner doors on reasonable belief.
(3) WHO
Dignity gate
If a secluded woman occupies the room, notice + time + facility must precede entry.
↓ each gate must be cleared before the next becomes relevant ↓
The sub-sections interlock. Sub-section (2)’s pivot — “when … has duly gained access” — hands off to the inner-room stage where (3) waits; and (3)’s closing words “consistent with these provisions” reach back and re-bind the officer to (1) and (2). Three gates, one continuous and narrowing channel of lawful entry.

The principle behind it

Maxim · the inviolability of the home
“The house of every one is to him as his castle and fortress.”

A dwelling is a sanctuary; even the State’s lawful officer may cross its threshold only on strict, measured terms — the very discipline Section 62 imposes on the act of seizure.

Origin: Sir Edward Coke in Semayne’s Case (1604) 5 Co. Rep. 91a, 77 ER 194 — “the house of every one is to him as his castle and fortress, as well for his defence against injury and violence, as for his repose.” The same case recognised that the sheriff may nonetheless break and enter to execute the King’s process after demand and refusal of entry — the precise balance Section 62(2) codifies in “refuses or in any way prevents access.”

Connected provisions

Section 62 governs the manner of a seizure whose power and targets come from neighbouring sections.

Apply the section — four quick checks
1 An officer reaches the debtor’s house at 7 p.m., after sunset, to seize the TV. May he enter? No — sub-section (1) bars entry after sunset; he must wait for sunrise.
2 By day, the debtor bolts his front door and forbids entry. May the officer force it? Yes — it is the debtor’s own house and he prevents access, so (2) permits breaking the outer door.
3 The house belongs to the debtor’s friend, who refuses entry. Force the outer door? No — the exception reaches only a house “in the occupancy of the judgment-debtor.”
4 Inside, a locked room is occupied by a woman who observes purdah. Break straight in? No — (3) first requires notice that she may withdraw, reasonable time, and facility to leave; then he may enter, guarding the goods.
Part II · Execution · Section 62 — Seizure of property in a dwelling-house.