Welcome to LawTutorial.in – Your Partner in Understanding Law

CPC, 1908 — Section 81: Exemption from arrest and personal appearance

CPC, 1908 · Part IV · Suits in Particular Cases · Protecting the public officer

Section 81 — Exemption from arrest and personal appearance

When a public officer is sued for something done in his official capacity, the Code shields him while the case runs: he cannot be arrested nor his property attached (except in executing a decree), and the Court must excuse his personal appearance if his absence would harm the public service.

§ 81

How to read Section 81

Two shields

While such a suit is pending, the officer gets two protections: (a) no arrest and no attachment of his property, and (b) excusal from appearing in person.

The limit

These guard him during the suit — not after. The bar on arrest/attachment is “otherwise than in execution of a decree”, so once a decree is passed, ordinary execution applies.

Why it exists

So that public duty is not disrupted by litigation over official acts — the officer keeps serving while the case is decided.

The bare Act

Section 81 · verbatim

In a suit instituted against a public officer in respect of any act purporting to be done by him in his official capacity—

(a) the defendant shall not be liable to arrest nor his property to attachment otherwise than in execution of a decree, and
(b) where the Court is satisfied that the defendant cannot absent himself from his duty without detriment to the public service, it shall exempt him from appearing in person.

Section 81 stands as in the original 1908 Code — unamended. Procedure for suits by or against public officers is in Order XXVII.

Key terms decoded

Public officer

A holder of public office (defined in § 2(17)). § 81 protects him only when sued for an act in his official capacity.

Act purporting to be done in official capacity

An act done, or claimed to be done, under colour of office — the protections attach to the official character of the act, not the officer’s private dealings.

Not liable to arrest

He cannot be arrested in the suit — the usual coercive pressure on a defendant is withheld from a serving officer.

Nor his property to attachment

His property cannot be attached either — his assets are not frozen merely because the suit is on foot.

Otherwise than in execution of a decree

The crucial limit: the bar applies only before a decree. Once a decree is passed against him, it may be executed in the ordinary way.

Detriment to the public service

The test in (b): if the officer’s absence from duty would harm the public service, the Court must relieve him of attending in person.

Exempt him from appearing in person

A mandatory relief — the word is “shall”. He may act through a pleader / authorised agent instead of attending court himself.

The picture — two shields, one limit

Public officer sued for an OFFICIAL act (a) No arrest · no attachment of his property — while the suit runs. Except in execution of a decree. (b) Court SHALL excuse personal appearance — if his absence would harm the public service.

Both shields operate only while the suit is pending. The bar on arrest and attachment is expressly “otherwise than in execution of a decree” — so a decree, once passed, is executed normally.

Section 81, clause by clause

The setting
In a suit instituted against a public officer
The protections arise only in a suit brought against a public officer — not the Government as such, and not a private defendant.
Official acts only
in respect of any act purporting to be done by him in his official capacity
And only where the suit concerns an act done, or purporting to be done, in his official capacity. His private acts get no shield.
(a) No arrest / attachment
the defendant shall not be liable to arrest nor his property to attachment otherwise than in execution of a decree
First shield: during the suit he cannot be arrested and his property cannot be attached — the one exception being execution of a decree (i.e. after a decree is passed).
(b) The condition
where the Court is satisfied that the defendant cannot absent himself from his duty without detriment to the public service
Second shield’s trigger: the Court must be satisfied that the officer’s absence from duty would harm the public service.
(b) The relief
it shall exempt him from appearing in person
If so, the Court shall — mandatorily — excuse him from attending court in person; he may act through a pleader instead.

Connected provisions

Section 81 is the third step of the Government-as-litigant cluster: § 79 names the party, § 80 requires notice before suing, § 81 protects the public officer during the suit, and § 82 governs how a decree against the Government or officer is satisfied. Procedure: Order XXVII; “public officer” is defined in § 2(17).

Test yourself
1 A public officer is sued for an official act. Can he be arrested before any decree? — No — § 81(a) bars arrest and attachment otherwise than in execution of a decree.
2 After a decree is passed against him, do the protections continue? — No — execution proceeds normally; (a) shields only the pre-decree stage.
3 His attendance would harm the public service. Must he appear in person? — No — § 81(b): the Court shall exempt him from appearing in person.
Part IV · Suits in Particular Cases · Section 81 — Exemption from arrest and personal appearance.