Welcome to LawTutorial.in – Your Partner in Understanding Law

CPC, 1908 — Section 87A: Definitions of foreign State and Ruler

CPC, 1908 · Part IV · Suits in Particular Cases · Definitions for the foreign-State group

Section 87A — Definitions of “foreign State” and “Ruler”

Sections 84–87 turn on two words. Section 87A defines them: a foreign State is any State outside India that the Central Government has recognised; a Ruler is whoever the Government recognises, for the time being, as its head. And the courts simply take judicial notice of that recognition.

§ 87A

How to read Section 87A

Two definitions

For this Part, a “foreign State” is any State outside India recognised by the Central Government; a “Ruler” is the person the Government recognises, for the time being, as its head.

Recognition is the key

Both turn entirely on recognition by the Central Government — an executive, political act, not something the court decides for itself.

Judicial notice

A court takes no evidence on the point — it takes judicial notice of whether the Government has, or has not, recognised the State or its head.

The bare Act

Section 87A · verbatim

(1) In this Part,—

(a) “foreign State” means any State outside India which has been recognised by the Central Government; and
(b) “Ruler”, in relation to a foreign State, means the person who is for the time being recognized by the Central Government to be the head of that State.

(2) Every Court shall take judicial notice of the fact—

(a) that a State has or has not been recognized by the Central Government;
(b) that a person has or has not been recognized by the Central Government to be the head of a State.

Section 87A was inserted by Act 2 of 1951 (w.e.f. 1-4-1951), as part of the same recast that substituted §§ 83–87. These definitions govern the whole foreign-State group (§§ 84–87, 87B).

Key terms decoded

Foreign State

Any State outside India that has been recognised by the Central Government. Without that recognition, a body is not a “foreign State” for this Part.

Ruler

The person the Central Government recognises, for the time being, as the head of that foreign State.

Recognised by the Central Government

The decisive act — recognition of States and heads of State is an executive function, conclusive for the courts.

For the time being

Recognition can change — the “Ruler” is whoever the Government currently recognises as head, not a fixed person.

Judicial notice

A fact the court accepts without proof. Under sub-s. (2) the court does not try the question of recognition — it simply notices it.

Has or has not been recognized

Judicial notice cuts both ways — of recognition and of its absence, for both a State and its head.

The picture — recognition decides, the court notices

Recognition by the Central Government “foreign State” a State outside India “Ruler” its head, for the time being Every court takes JUDICIAL NOTICE of whether recognition has / has not been given

Both definitions hang on one executive act — recognition by the Central Government. The court never tries that question; sub-section (2) tells it simply to take judicial notice of the answer, either way.

Section 87A, part by part



“foreign State”= any State outside Indiarecognised by the Central Govt“Ruler”= head of that State,recognised (for the time being)
Scope
In this Part,—
These meanings apply throughout Part IV’s foreign-State provisions (§§ 84–87, 87B).
foreign State
“foreign State” means any State outside India which has been recognised by the Central Government; and
A “foreign State” is any State outside India — but only if the Central Government has recognised it. Recognition is the gate.
Ruler
“Ruler”, in relation to a foreign State, means the person who is for the time being recognized by the Central Government to be the head of that State.
A “Ruler” is whoever the Central Government recognises, for the time being, as the head of that State — a status that can change with recognition.
Every courtno evidence needednotices(a) a State HAS / HAS NOT been recognised(b) a head HAS / HAS NOT been recognised
No proof needed
Every Court shall take judicial notice of the fact—
The court does not try the question of recognition or take evidence on it — it takes judicial notice of the fact.
(a) the State
that a State has or has not been recognized by the Central Government;
Of whether a State has — or has not — been recognised by the Central Government.
(b) the head
that a person has or has not been recognized by the Central Government to be the head of a State.
And of whether a person has — or has not — been recognised as the head of a State.

How the two sub-sections work as one body

Recognition defines → the court notices

(1) The definitions

Both “foreign State” and “Ruler” are pinned to one thing — recognition by the Central Government, an executive act.

(2) Judicial notice

So the court never investigates recognition — it simply takes judicial notice of whether it has, or has not, been given.

Recognition of foreign States and their heads is a political / executive question; § 87A keeps it out of the court’s fact-finding — the court accepts what the Government has done, conclusively.

Connected provisions

Section 87A supplies the vocabulary for Part IV’s foreign-sovereigns group (§§ 83–87B): a foreign State suing (§ 84), its agents (§ 85), suits against it (§ 86), the Ruler’s style (§ 87) and — next — § 87B applying §§ 85–86 to Rulers of former Indian States.

Test yourself
1 What is a “foreign State” under this Part? — any State outside India recognised by the Central Government [§ 87A(1)(a)].
2 Who decides whether a State or its head is recognised? — the Central Government; the court does not try it — it takes judicial notice [§ 87A(2)].
3 Can the recognised “Ruler” change? — Yes — “for the time being”: it is whoever the Government currently recognises as head.
Part IV · Suits in Particular Cases · Section 87A — Definitions of “foreign State” and “Ruler”.