Procedure of Court in case of question being asked without reasonable grounds
A professional consequence. If the court finds that a character-injuring question was asked without reasonable grounds, and it was put by an advocate, the court may report the matter to the High Court or other authority governing that advocate’s profession.
How to read Section 153
If an advocate puts a baseless character question, the court may refer the matter to the authority that governs his profession.
The court is of opinion that a § 152-type question was asked without reasonable grounds.
And the question was put by an advocate.
The court may report the circumstances to the High Court or other professional authority the advocate is subject to.
The bare Act
The section in its own words — a single, enforcing rule.
If the Court is of opinion that any such question was asked without reasonable grounds, it may, if it was asked by any advocate, report the circumstances of the case to the High Court or other authority to which such advocate is subject in the exercise of his profession.
In short: § 152 says a character-injuring question ought not to be asked without reasonable grounds. This section supplies the teeth. Where the court forms the opinion that such a question was in fact asked without reasonable grounds, and it was put by an advocate, the court may — the power is discretionary — report the circumstances to the High Court or to whatever other authority governs that advocate in the exercise of his profession (in practice, the disciplinary authority such as the Bar Council). The consequence is therefore professional, not a penalty in the case itself: the advocate may be answerable to his regulator for putting a groundless slur to a witness. The provision works hand-in-hand with § 152 to deter gratuitous smearing — the restraint is stated in § 152, and the referral for breaching it is provided here.
→ This carries forward IEA 1872 § 150 — the court may report an advocate who asks a baseless character question.
Glossary
A credit-injuring question of the kind in § 152.
Lacking the genuine basis § 152 requires.
The report route applies where the questioner is an advocate.
Refer the matter for professional consideration.
The body governing the advocate’s profession (e.g. the Bar Council).
The disciplinary authority over his practice.
The picture
A groundless character question by counsel can be referred upward — a professional, not a case, consequence.
The section, part by part
Tap a part — the picture-story tells it first; the word-by-word text and example follow.
the triggerA baseless character question, put by an advocate
the reportReferred to the authority that governs the advocate
Connected provisions
Reasonable grounds required
The restraint — a character question needs reasonable grounds; § 153 provides the referral for breaching it.
Indecent and scandalous questions
The court may forbid indecent or scandalous questions — unless they relate to the facts in issue.
Court decides credit questions
The discretion over credit-only questions that §§ 152–153 back with a good-faith duty.
IEA 1872, § 150
Carried forward — the court may report an advocate who asks a baseless character question.
