Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023
India’s law of evidence — it replaces the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, and governs which facts a court may look at, how they are proved, and who must prove them. Text as on 6 October 2025.
Read the Adhiniyam as three questions — every chapter answers one of them. Tap any § number to open that section.
Which facts may the court look at?
Preliminary
§§ 1–2 · 2 sectionsShort title, application and commencement — and the definitions (“fact”, “evidence”, “proved”, “document”) the whole Act runs on.
Relevancy of Facts
§§ 3–50 · 48 sectionsWhen one fact connects to another — res gestae, motive and conspiracy; admissions and confessions; dying declarations; judgments, expert opinion and character.
How are those facts proved?
Facts which need not be proved
§§ 51–53 · 3 sectionsWhat needs no proof at all — facts the court judicially notices, and facts the parties admit.
Of Oral Evidence
§§ 54–55 · 2 sectionsEvery fact except the contents of a document may be proved by oral evidence — and oral evidence must be direct.
Of Documentary Evidence
§§ 56–93 · 38 sectionsDocuments and electronic records — primary and secondary evidence, certified copies, public documents, and the presumptions attached to them.
Who must prove them — and through whom?
Of the Burden of Proof
§§ 104–120 · 17 sectionsWho must prove what — the burden-of-proof rules, and the presumptions that shift the burden.
Estoppel
§§ 121–123 · 3 sectionsWhen your own declaration, act or omission closes your mouth — you cannot deny what you made another believe and act upon.
Of Witnesses
§§ 124–139 · 16 sectionsWho may testify — competency of witnesses, and the privileges: spouses, affairs of State, professional communications.
Of Examination of Witnesses
§§ 140–168 · 29 sectionsHow testimony is actually taken — examination-in-chief, cross and re-examination, leading questions, impeaching credit, refreshing memory, the judge’s power to question.
Of Improper Admission and Rejection of Evidence
§ 169 · 1 sectionA wrong ruling on admissibility is not, by itself, a ground for a new trial or reversal — unless it should have changed the result.
Repeal and Savings
§ 170 · 1 sectionRepeals the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 — saving everything already done under it.
