Facts which are occasion, cause or effect of facts in issue or relevant facts
The second route in the catalogue: the surroundings of the main event — its occasion, its causes and effects, the state of things it happened in, and the opportunity that let it happen.
How to read Section 5
Five doorways, one anchor, and a line that separates it from § 4.
Five categories around the main event: occasion, cause, effect, the state of things, and the opportunity — all relevant.
The link may be near or remote — a cause need not act instantly, an effect may surface later.
§ 4 welds facts into the transaction itself; § 5 admits the surroundings — what stood before, around and after it.
The bare Act
The section in its own words — colour-keyed by what each phrase does.
Facts which are the occasion, cause or effect, immediate or otherwise, of relevant facts, or facts in issue, or which constitute the state of things under which they happened, or which afforded an opportunity for their occurrence or transaction, are relevant.
(a) The question is, whether A robbed B. The facts that, shortly before the robbery, B went to a fair with money in his possession, and that he showed it, or mentioned the fact that he had it, to third persons, are relevant.
(b) The question is, whether A murdered B. Marks on the ground, produced by a struggle at or near the place where the murder was committed, are relevant facts.
(c) The question is, whether A poisoned B. The state of B’s health before the symptoms ascribed to poison, and habits of B, known to A, which afforded an opportunity for the administration of poison, are relevant facts.
In short: around every fact in issue the law opens five doorways — what set the stage (occasion), what produced it and what it produced (cause & effect, near or remote), the standing condition of things, and whatever gave the opportunity for it to happen.
→ § 4 brought in the transaction itself; § 5 brings in its context — the stage, the trigger and the traces.
Glossary
The circumstance that set the stage — B carrying money to the fair was the occasion of the robbery.
What led to the event, and what the event left behind — like struggle marks on the ground.
The standing backdrop — B’s health before the alleged poisoning.
What opened the door — B’s habits, known to A, gave A the chance to administer poison.
Near or remote — the connection need not be instant to count.
The picture
Five doorways, one centre.
The section, part by part
Tap a part — the picture-story tells it first; the word-by-word text and example follow.
the ruleFive doorways around the event
IllustrationsThe three pictures the Act itself gives
Illustration (a) — before the robbery, B carried money to a fair and showed or mentioned it — that occasion is relevant. (tap to zoom)
Illustration (b) — marks of a struggle on the ground near the murder spot are effects the event left behind — relevant. (tap to zoom)
Illustration (c) — B’s prior health and habits known to A (an opportunity to administer poison) are the state of things — relevant. (tap to zoom)
Connected provisions
Motive, preparation & conduct
The next route: why a person acted, how they prepared, and how they behaved before and after.
IEA 1872, § 7
This provision carries forward section 7 of the repealed Evidence Act.
