Proof of documents by primary evidence
The pivot of the chapter. Documents shall be proved by primary evidence — the original itself — except in the cases mentioned in § 60. In one line, this is the best-evidence rule: original first, substitute only when the law allows.
How to read Section 59
One rule, one door.
Documents shall be proved by primary evidence — the original.
Except in the cases § 60 lists — where secondary evidence is allowed.
The best-evidence principle — prefer the original, always.
The bare Act
The section in its own words — colour-keyed by what each phrase does.
Documents shall be proved by primary evidence except in the cases hereinafter mentioned.
In short: this single sentence is the hinge of the documentary-evidence chapter. Having defined primary (§ 57) and secondary (§ 58) evidence, the Act now sets the order of preference: the original is required. The words “except in the cases hereinafter mentioned” are not a loophole — they point precisely to § 60, which lists the defined situations in which secondary evidence may be given (loss or destruction, the document being in the opponent’s or a stranger’s hands, public documents, and so on). Until such a ground is shown, primary evidence it must be.
→ This carries forward IEA 1872 § 64 — the best-evidence rule for documents.
Glossary
The original document itself — § 57.
Mandatory — not a matter of the party’s choice.
A substitute — allowed only under § 60 (§ 58 lists the kinds).
The cases set out later — principally § 60.
Prefer the original; accept substitutes only when it is unavailable.
The § 60 fact that must be proved before secondary evidence is received.
The picture
The rule, and the one door out of it.
The section, part by part
Tap a part — the picture-story tells it first; the word-by-word text and example follow.
the ruleThe original is the rule — substitutes are the exception
rule & exceptionsHow § 59 works with § 60
Connected provisions
IEA 1872, § 64
Carried forward — proof of documents by primary evidence.
