Provincial Small Cause Courts
A list of CPC provisions that do not apply to a Provincial Court of Small Causes — a negative, exclusion rule.
The bare Act
The section in its own words. Bracketed phrases […] are words added or substituted by later amendments — the notes and timeline below give each one.
The following provisions shall not extend to Courts constituted under the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 (9 of 1887),1 [or under the Berar Small Cause Courts Law, 1905,] or to Courts exercising the jurisdiction of a Court of Small Causes2 [under the said Act or Law,]3 [or to Courts in4 [any part of India to which the said Act does not extend] exercising a corresponding jurisdiction,] that is to say,—
1. Ins. by Act 4 of 1941, s. 2 and the Third Schedule.
2. Subs. by s. 2 and the Third Schedule, ibid., for “under that Act”.
3. Ins. by Act 2 of 1951, s. 5.
4. Subs. by the Adaptation of Laws (No. 2) Order, 1956, for “Part B States”.
5. Subs. by Act 1 of 1926, s. 3, for “so far as they relate to injunctions and interlocutory orders”.
In short: the listed CPC provisions do not apply to Small Cause Courts (under the 1887 Act, the Berar 1905 Law, or a corresponding jurisdiction). Excluded are (a) the parts of the Code on suits outside a Small Cause Court’s cognizance and on executing decrees / decrees against immovable property, and (b) named sections — § 9, §§ 91–92, §§ 94–95 (only as to attachment of immovable property, injunctions, receivers and the § 94(e) interlocutory orders), and §§ 96–112 and 115.
→ Small Cause Courts decide small suits quickly — so the Code’s heavy machinery (appeals §§ 96–112, revision § 115, and immovable-property process) is switched off for them.
Read the full guide
Get the Library Pass or the full course to read the complete dissection, tabs and roadmaps.
Log inCreate free account