Official communications
Confidence in office. A public officer cannot be compelled to disclose communications made to him in official confidence — when he considers that disclosure would harm the public interest.
How to read Section 130
A public officer cannot be forced to reveal what was told to him in official confidence — where, in his view, disclosure would hurt the public interest.
A public officer, and communications made to him in official confidence.
He cannot be compelled to disclose them.
When he considers that the public interest would suffer by the disclosure.
The bare Act
The section in its own words — a single, self-contained rule.
No public officer shall be compelled to disclose communications made to him in official confidence, when he considers that the public interests would suffer by the disclosure.
In short: where § 129 shields official records about affairs of State, § 130 shields confidential official communications. A public officer who has received a communication in official confidence cannot be forced to reveal it — but only when he considers that disclosure would harm the public interest. Three things to hold onto. It is a protection against compulsion only. It covers what was told to the officer in confidence in his official capacity — not everything he happens to know. And the trigger is the officer’s own assessment of harm to the public interest. Because it turns on that judgment, it operates within the broader law of public-interest immunity, where the court ultimately balances the interest in confidentiality against the interest in disclosure. Classic examples are the reports of informants and confidential official correspondence.
→ This carries forward IEA 1872 § 124 — the privilege for official communications made in confidence.
Glossary
A person holding a public office / serving the State.
A communication received confidentially in the course of official duty.
Forced to reveal it in evidence — the section bars only compulsion.
On the officer’s own assessment of the position.
The public good would be harmed by the disclosure.
§ 129 protects unpublished State records (the department head decides); § 130 protects confidential communications (the officer decides).
The picture
A confidence received in office is not forced out — where the officer judges the public interest would suffer.
The section, part by part
Tap a part — the picture-story tells it first; the word-by-word text and example follow.
the privilegeA confidence received in office cannot be forced out
§ 129 vs § 130Records vs communications — department head vs the officer
Connected provisions
Evidence as to affairs of State
The companion privilege — unpublished State records, gatekept by the department head.
Information as to commission of offences
A magistrate, police or revenue officer need not say whence he got information of an offence — the informer’s shield.
IEA 1872, § 124
Carried forward — the privilege for official communications made in confidence.
