Relevancy of statements as to any law contained in law books, including electronic or digital form
When the Court has to form an opinion on the law of any country, section 32 makes the specified Government-authorised law books and reports of court rulings relevant, including electronic or digital forms.
How to read Section 32
“Any country” is the statutory scope. Judicial notice is a separate question.
The Court has to form an opinion on a law of any country.
A law book published under that Government’s authority, or a book purporting to report rulings of that country’s courts, including electronic or digital form.
The specified statements are relevant. Read Indian-law judicial notice separately under section 52.
The bare Act
The section in its own words — colour-keyed by what each phrase does.
When the Court has to form an opinion as to a law of any country, any statement of such law contained in a book purporting to be printed or published including in electronic or digital form under the authority of the Government of such country and to contain any such law, and any report of a ruling of the Courts of such country contained in a book including in electronic or digital form purporting to be a report of such rulings, is relevant.
In short: The provision says any country, not foreign countries only. Government authority qualifies the law-book branch; reports of court rulings form the other branch. Foreign-law questions provide a common application. Indian law is ordinarily judicially noticed under section 52, but that does not rewrite the scope of section 32.
Correspondence: IEA section 38; the BSA expressly mentions electronic or digital forms.
Glossary
The statute does not restrict this expression to foreign law. Read judicial notice of Indian law separately under section 52.
Published officially by or under that country’s Government — the mark of reliability.
A law report — the published record of a court’s decisions in that country.
Appearing on its face to be the official law book or law report — the section works on that appearance.
The 2023 update — an online statute database or e-law-report counts equally with print.
The specified statement may be used when the Court forms its opinion on that law; this does not make every assertion in every book conclusive.
The picture
Two source categories, one any-country scope; judicial notice remains a separate rule.
The section, part by part
Tap a part — the picture-story tells it first; the word-by-word text and example follow.
the ruleStatements concerning the law of any country
the two proofsStatute-book and law reports
Connected provisions
Public-nature facts
Section 31 concerns specified public-nature facts; section 32 concerns statements of law in the specified books or reports, for any country.
IEA 1872, § 38
Carried forward — now expressly admitting electronic/digital law books and reports.
Sources and reading note
BSA sections 32 and 52: distinguish the scope of a relevancy provision from the obligation to take judicial notice.
Explanatory corrections reviewed on 24 September 2026. Statutory quotation and commentary are kept separate.
