Welcome to LawTutorial.in – Your Partner in Understanding Law
Join Now

BSA 2023 — Section 8: Things said or done by conspirator in reference to common design

§ SECTION 8 · BSA 2023 · CHAPTER II — RELEVANCY OF FACTS

Things said or done by conspirator in reference to common design

The conspiracy rule: once a plot is reasonably shown, one conspirator’s words, deeds and writings about the design bind them all — to prove the plot, and to prove who belongs to it.

How to read Section 8

A threshold, a tether, a clock — and then the widest net in the chapter.

What it is about

In a conspiracy, any one member’s acts, words and writings about the design are evidence against every member.

Three safeguards

Threshold: reasonable ground first. Tether: only things in reference to the common intention. Clock: only after the design was first entertained.

How far it reaches

It binds even a member who was ignorant of the act, done by a stranger to him, before he joined or after he left — the illustration says all three.

The bare Act

The section in its own words — colour-keyed by what each phrase does.

Section 8 · verbatim

Where there is reasonable ground to believe that two or more persons have conspired together to commit an offence or an actionable wrong, anything said, done or written by any one of such persons in reference to their common intention, after the time when such intention was first entertained by any one of them, is a relevant fact as against each of the persons believed to be so conspiring, as well for the purpose of proving the existence of the conspiracy as for the purpose of showing that any such person was a party to it.

Illustration

Reasonable ground exists for believing that A has joined in a conspiracy to wage war against the State.

The facts that B procured arms in Europe for the purpose of the conspiracy, C collected money in Kolkata for a like object, D persuaded persons to join the conspiracy in Mumbai, E published writings advocating the object in view at Agra, and F transmitted from Delhi to G at Singapore the money which C had collected at Kolkata, and the contents of a letter written by H giving an account of the conspiracy, are each relevant, both to prove the existence of the conspiracy, and to prove A’s complicity in it, although he may have been ignorant of all of them, and although the persons by whom they were done were strangers to him, and although they may have taken place before he joined the conspiracy or after he left it.

In short: conspiracy is teamwork — so the law treats the team as one actor. Show reasonable ground for the plot, and every member’s design-related words, deeds and writings — from the design’s birth onward — count against all of them, both to prove the plot and to fix each member in it.

→ The width is deliberate: plots are hatched in the dark, so the law lets each lit corner illuminate the whole room.

Glossary

conspiracy

An agreement of two or more to commit an offence or actionable wrong — the crime itself is defined in the BNS; this section is about evidence of it.

reasonable ground

The threshold foundation — prima facie material of the plot, not full proof.

common intention / design

The shared object the members pursue — the tether every admitted act must connect to.

actionable wrong

A civil wrong that can found a suit — the section covers civil plots too.

agency principle

“One speaks for all” — each conspirator is treated as the agent of the rest for design-related acts.

The picture

The Act’s own illustration, drawn: seven hands, five cities, one design — and A at the edge, bound by it all.

COMMONDESIGNBprocured armsEuropeDpersuaded recruitsMumbaiEpublished writingsAgraFsent C’s money to GDelhi → SingaporeCcollected moneyKolkataHwrote a letterabout the plotAthe accusedbelieved to be in the plotevery act in reference to the design — by any hand, in any city — binds each believed conspirator,even one who knew nothing of it, and even for acts before he joined or after he left

The section, part by part

Tap a part — the picture-story tells it first; the word-by-word text and example follow.

the ruleOne speaks for all

In one lineOnce there is reasonable ground to believe a conspiracy, whatever any one conspirator said, did or wrote about the design binds them all — to prove the plot, and to prove membership.
1A plot is afootreasonable ground: two ormore have conspired2One speaks for allanything said, done or writtenby any one — about the design3BINDS THEM ALLproves the plot exists —and who belongs to itthe agency principle: conspirators act as one body
Where there is reasonable ground to believethe thresholdfirst lay a foundation: reasonable ground — not full proof — that a conspiracy exists.
that two or more persons have conspired together to commit an offence or an actionable wrong,the targeta crime — or an actionable civil wrong.
anything said, done or written by any one of such personsone speaks for allthe words, deeds and writings of ANY conspirator…
in reference to their common intention,the tether…but only those referring to the common design — not his private affairs.
after the time when such intention was first entertained by any one of them,the clockonly from the moment the design was first born in any one mind.
is a relevant fact as against each of the persons believed to be so conspiring,binds them allit counts against every believed conspirator — not just the actor.
as well for the purpose of proving the existence of the conspiracyuse 1to prove the plot exists…
as for the purpose of showing that any such person was a party to it.use 2…and to prove who belongs to it.
ExampleA bank-heist plan: one member buys duplicate keys, another scouts the vault, a third messages the group about “the job”. Once reasonable ground of the plan is laid, each act and message binds every member — including the one who only stood watch.
✗ Not thisThe tether is strict: a conspirator’s words about his private affairs do not bind the others. And once the design is over, a statement merely narrating the past (a confession after arrest, for instance) is not “in reference to the common intention” — it binds its maker alone.

IllustrationThe A-to-H conspiracy

In one lineSeven hands in five cities — arms, money, recruits, writings, transfers, a letter — and every one of them binds A.
B to H — the actsthe networkB procured arms (Europe) · C collected money (Kolkata) · D persuaded recruits (Mumbai) · E published writings (Agra) · F transmitted C’s money to G (Delhi→Singapore) · H wrote a letter about the plot — each relevant.
both purposeswhy they enterto prove the conspiracy exists — and to prove A’s complicity in it.
the three “although”s⚠ the shockersalthough A was ignorant of them all · although the actors were strangers to him · although they happened before he joined or after he left.
design bornA’s membershipC collects moneyE publishesF sends moneyacts before A joined — and after he left — still bind himthe clock runs from the design’s birth — not from A’s joining
ExampleThis is why conspiracy is called an exception written into relevancy itself: nowhere else does a stranger’s act, unknown to the accused, done before he even joined, count against him. The safeguard is the threshold — reasonable ground first — and the tether — only acts in reference to the design.

Connected provisions

§ 6

Conduct

§ 6 admits a person’s own conduct; § 8 goes further — a co-conspirator’s acts bind him too.

§ 7

Helper facts

Identity, time, place and relations — the stagehands that make a conspiracy case readable.

BNS 2023

Criminal conspiracy

The offence itself lives in the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita — this section only supplies the evidentiary rule.

lineage

IEA 1872, § 10

This provision carries forward section 10 of the repealed Evidence Act.