Relevancy of certain judgments in probate, matrimonial, admiralty and insolvency jurisdiction
Judgments in rem: a final decree of a competent Court in probate, matrimonial, admiralty or insolvency jurisdiction that confers, removes or declares a legal character or title absolutely is relevant — and conclusive proof of that status and its timing.
How to read Section 35
A status fixed for the whole world.
A competent Court or Tribunal in probate, matrimonial, admiralty or insolvency jurisdiction — the four in rem jurisdictions.
Confers, removes or declares a legal character, or entitlement to a specific thing — absolutely, against all.
Relevant when the status/title is in issue — and conclusive proof of it and of when it began or ended.
The bare Act
The section in its own words — colour-keyed by what each phrase does.
(1) A final judgment, order or decree of a competent Court or Tribunal, in the exercise of probate, matrimonial, admiralty or insolvency jurisdiction, which confers upon or takes away from any person any legal character, or which declares any person to be entitled to any such character, or to be entitled to any specific thing, not as against any specified person but absolutely, is relevant when the existence of any such legal character, or the title of any such person to any such thing, is relevant.
(2) Such judgment, order or decree is conclusive proof that—
In short: a handful of courts decide questions of status — who is validly married, who may administer an estate, whether a person is insolvent, whether a ship is condemned. Because such a status must be the same for everyone, these judgments bind the whole world and are conclusive — including on exactly when the status began or ended.
→ This carries forward IEA 1872 § 41 — the classic “judgments in rem” provision.
Glossary
A decision on a status or thing that binds the whole world — not merely the parties before the court.
A legal status — heir, executor, spouse, insolvent — that the law attaches consequences to.
The four jurisdictions whose judgments this section makes conclusive — wills, marriage, ships, insolvency.
The decision holds against everyone, not just one named opponent — the hallmark of in rem.
Proof the Court must accept and will not allow to be disproved — contrast an admission (§ 25).
When a status began or ended — the timing that clauses (i)–(iv) make conclusive.
The picture
A judgment in rem binds everyone — conclusively.
The section, part by part
Tap a part — the picture-story tells it first; the word-by-word text and example follow.
the ruleJudgments that fix a status for everyone
conclusive proofNot just the status — the timing too
judgments in remWhy these bind everyone
Connected provisions
Judgments as a bar
§ 34 uses a judgment to bar a re-do; § 35 uses an in rem judgment to prove a status conclusively.
Conclusive proof
An admission is never conclusive; an in rem judgment is — the two ends of the weight scale.
Public-nature judgments (not conclusive)
The next judgment-relevancy provision in Chapter II.
IEA 1872, § 41
Carried forward — the classic judgments in rem section.
